(1) Each agency specifies a minimum % full time equivalent (FTE) effort. The K candidate and sponsoring institution are required to agree that this % FTE will be guaranteed as K-related career development and research activities time. The sponsor must agree to hold the sponsoring institution responsible, and to intervene as needed (e.g., if a department chair assigns teaching or service obligations that make it impossible for this requirement to be fulfilled).
To be safe, I recommend stating that the K candidate's FTE will be 5% above the minimum set by the agency.
Somewhere prominent in the application (e.g., budget justification), this type of language can explain If Itthe situation.
Here the example is written with an assumption that NIDA requires 75% and that 5%+ would be 80%
I am able to
commit a full 80% FTE to the proposed K01 career development award activities
-- that is, 5% FTE more than NIDA
stipulates as the minimum. Nonetheless, in fact, I plan to spend 100% FTE at
the specified salary dollar amount -- unless there are unforeseen circumstances
that require me to add to this salary income (e.g., unexpected family medical
expenses). In any event, I can fully commit to the 80% FTE as required by
NIDA, even if there is need for this type of salary supplementation.
This approach takes off the table an issue that sometimes surfaces.
(2) How do you get that extra money?
More on Gurdijieff, if you are interested:
http://www.gurdjieff.org/owens2.htm
#gurdjieff
#K01
#K99
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments to this blog are moderated. Urgent or other time-sensitive messages should not be sent via the blog.