#kawards
#grants
#NIH
#K01
#K99
This note pertains to entry-K award types at NIH.
If you do not have an established employee salary or a prior agreement, my recommendation for salary level is to look at what the proposed sponsoring institution now pays
people to function as non-tenure track "term contract" postdoctoral
research scientists and associates on a per month basis.
At our own public university, this is a matter of public record. You must find the type
of "comparable" non-tenure track university employee in terms of training
and experience and duties across the span of instruction (minimal),
service (essentially zip), and research (all phases
through publication and writing new R proposals). Look first for these
comparables within the dept where you will be positioned.If none exist
in the dept, look at the tenure track facultty and also within the college in other departments. This approach is consistent with what
NIH policy indicates. You should not ask
for less nor more.
[If you ask for NRSA PDF stipend level, you are cheating yourself
AND you are not following NIH policy. A K awardee is NOT an NRSA fellow,
with stipend deliberately set lower than market value each year, with a
logic that reflects the logic of setting
minimum wage (I.e., do not compete with private industry that might
wish to hire the equivalent level of talent; set the salary/stipend low
enough that the talent moves into private industry).]
Then in the proposal section on career commitment (subsection of
Personal Statement), clearly explain that your position at the
sponsoring institution actually makes it possible for you to allocate
more than the required time required by the agency to
do the K. (What is that required amount? It varies by agency: 75% or
80% is typical institute specification). And that you either will be
working full-time on the research and career development at no expense
to the agency, or will work out with your "sponsor
and mentoring team" a source of complementary income via additional
teaching and research responsibilities (e.g., being listed for the
complement of 20-25% on a funded research project, side-contracts for
analysis and writing work assignments from clinician-scientists
who need your talent).
[I repeat. Each agency sets the minimum percent effort, often 75%-80%. Unless there are reasons not to do that, set your own effort at that level (or above that level, which will constrain funds for other purposes outlined below).]
After you work out this detail, change the K budget plan to reflect
it, and make sure the dollar amount and percent effort are as specified
above.
Then, work within the residual amount to finance travel to
scientific meetings, tuition for career development activities, and
finally to do the modest pilot studies required to achieve the K aims.
You must work out these details BEFORE you ask the sponsor or dept
chair to sign their letters. Why? Because their letters have to be 100%
reflective of what your proposal and budget state in this regard.
Typically, these individuals are not going to micro-manage your
budget plan and make modifications in it. To do so violates the idea
that it is your independent career proposal. You have to look after
yourself, and then tell them what you have written
in the budget plan and career commitment. In fact, if you are smart,
you will write the paragraph in their letter for each of them, making
sure it says the same thing and is submitted so that both letters are
100% compatible. If you don't, you'll just be messing
around and wasting the ~$5000-$7500 that the sponsoring institution is
spending on your behalf each time it agrees to sponsor your K award
proposal.
(What are the cost components for that $5000-$7500? Mainly
administration and personnel charges for each hour of work that staff through
VP office are doing for you in order to submit and administer the
submission, times overhead, typically 50% plus on top
of that work charge, inclusive of time and effort of your sponsor and mentoring team as you work your way through the steps of writing and submitted and getting reviews of your K award proposal. I.e., real dollars in the sense that they mount
up. So make sure you are the one to take care of these details. No one
else is going to do it for you.)
People have asked me whether the compensation should be set differently for K99 versus K01 or other types of entry-K awards. I think not, but you can ask your project officer or other informed individuals if you want additional opinions.
Prof. James C. Anthony
(Calling name = Jim)
(Calling name = Jim)
@huicheng
@mchandra
@mparker
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments to this blog are moderated. Urgent or other time-sensitive messages should not be sent via the blog.