See especially Jim van Os podcast. Jim has done more than most to clear up links of cannabis-schizophrenia, but uncertainties remain. Some of the uncertainties disappear if you re-conceptualize a schizophrenia pychosis as a dimension of 'hyper-meaning.' But would you get much news coverage or citation impact if yo report than cannabis use is followed by an upward shift on the dimension of hyper-meaning?
P.s. Many of the interviewees are not based in the U.S.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments to this blog are moderated. Urgent or other time-sensitive messages should not be sent via the blog.